68 articles tagged with "legal"
The suspect in a notable murder case has opted to waive their preliminary hearing, potentially altering the trial's progression and strategic considerations.
Cindy Cohn, Executive Director of EFF, will discuss pivotal privacy challenges at an event on April 3, 2026, focusing on data security and federal overreach.
The FAA has issued a nationwide flight restriction for drones, impacting private operators' ability to monitor law enforcement activities. This move raises significant concerns regarding oversight and accountability.
Justice Samuel Alito was hospitalized on March 20 due to security recommendations. This incident raises questions about the operational capacity of the Supreme Court.
Tech nonprofits are raising alarms about government procurement strategies that may compromise AI trust and safety, particularly in relation to mass surveillance.
The recent Supreme Court oral arguments regarding birthright citizenship reveal significant implications for legal frameworks and immigration policies in the U.S.
Join EFF's Executive Director Cindy Cohn on April 3, 2026, as she discusses critical privacy battles that have influenced internet governance and data security.
In a rare public appearance, Chief Justice John Roberts spoke at Rice University, responding to personal attacks directed at him. His comments highlight the intersection of judicial integrity and public perception.
Comedian John Mulaney recently acknowledged SCOTUSblog during his appearance on 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert', emphasizing his interest in Supreme Court arguments.
A recent copyright claim by Higbee & Associates against May First Movement Technology highlights the complexities of copyright law and its implications for web hosting services.
The Supreme Court is evaluating a case involving Terry Pitchford, who challenges racial bias in jury selection, highlighting systemic issues in legal processes.
On April 2, President Trump became the first sitting president to attend oral arguments at the Supreme Court, a significant moment for the intersection of politics and law.
The oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara have concluded, focusing on the constitutionality of the executive order regarding birthright citizenship. The implications for policy and infrastructure are significant.
The Supreme Court's upcoming conference may consider several relisted cert petitions concerning veterans benefits, a critical area of legal focus.
The recent Supreme Court argument in Jules v Andre Balazs Properties highlights uncertainties regarding federal jurisdiction in confirming arbitration awards, impacting legal frameworks.
The Supreme Court's refusal to hear the appeal maintains the life sentence for a Louisiana man connected to the 'Tiger King' saga, impacting legal precedents in similar cases.
The impact of dissenting opinions in jury trial cases is significant for legal precedents, particularly in the context of the George Jarkesy case.
A judge has issued a temporary restraining order that pauses the Nexstar-Tegna merger, pending further legal review. This development raises significant implications for media industry mergers.
A US District Judge has ruled against a government ban on Anthropic AI, ensuring the company's ongoing operations in the AI sector.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has urged the US Supreme Court to hold technology companies accountable for their roles in human rights abuses abroad, particularly in the context of the Cisco Systems case.
On March 31, the court is expected to release opinions on argued cases from the current term, with live blogging to cover the developments.
A review of mid-20th century American perspectives on birthright citizenship reveals significant implications for today's legal and political frameworks.
A federal judge has ruled against the ban on Anthropic AI models, deeming the security risk label as Orwellian, which may have implications for future AI regulations.
Nicolas Maduro's ongoing legal issues in New York highlight the complexities of international legal frameworks and the implications for governance in Venezuela.
The Supreme Court will review Pitchford v. Cain, focusing on allegations of racial discrimination in jury selection, with implications for judicial processes in Mississippi.
A judge has issued a preliminary injunction allowing Anthropic to challenge the Pentagon's blacklisting, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal dispute.
A preliminary injunction has been issued in a significant legal case involving Anthropic and the U.S. Department of War, impacting AI regulatory frameworks.
The recent Supreme Court decision raises significant questions about the interpretation of the citizenship clause and its impact on legal structures surrounding citizenship.
The Supreme Court is reviewing the case Flowers Foods, Inc. v Brock, focusing on the implications of arbitration agreements for last-mile delivery drivers. This case could reshape labor rights within the sector.
Attorney Pete Patterson's recent assertions regarding birthright citizenship contain significant legal inaccuracies and fail to engage with critical arguments in the debate.
The Supreme Court will deliberate on the implications of venue jurisdiction in Abouammo v. United States, focusing on the potential for expanding venue based on a crime's contemplated effects.
A critical examination of the Amar brothers' stance on the 14th Amendment and its implications for citizenship rights, particularly regarding temporary visitors.
The Supreme Court's potential decision to support the Trump administration's asylum policy could significantly affect border management and processing systems.
The ongoing court case between Anthropic and the US Department of War highlights critical considerations for AI technology in military applications and regulatory frameworks.
A detailed examination of birthright citizenship reveals critical legal interpretations and potential impacts on immigration policy and infrastructure.
The Supreme Court is reviewing Mississippi's law permitting late-arriving mail-in ballots, which may have significant implications for election infrastructure.
The Supreme Court is set to potentially release opinions on argued cases during a live blogging session on March 25, impacting ongoing legal discussions.
A US jury concluded that Elon Musk provided misleading information to Twitter shareholders regarding the platform's bot accounts, raising questions about CEO accountability.
The recent clean extension of FISA by Congress, following the nominal reforms of the RISAA, highlights ongoing issues in surveillance infrastructure and its implications for data handling.
On April 1, 2026, the court will hear arguments in Trump v. Barbara regarding the constitutionality of an executive order on birthright citizenship. This live blog will track developments.
The case Flowers Foods v. Brock will address whether last-mile drivers are exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act, potentially impacting labor relations and arbitration practices.
A detailed examination of the Supreme Court's authority and its implications for the criminal justice system.
The Vatican appeals court has annulled the conviction of Cardinal Angelo Becciu, who was previously sentenced to five-and-a-half years for fraud. This decision has implications for the legal framework surrounding ecclesiastical financial governance.
This brief examines the Supreme Court of Canada, focusing on its structure, functions, and how it aligns with or diverges from other supreme courts globally.
Adam Feldman's series, Empirical SCOTUS, leverages Supreme Court data to analyze justices' decision-making processes, focusing on opinions and oral arguments.
A recent podcast episode features EFF's Cindy Cohn and Cory Doctorow discussing the critical role of privacy in the digital landscape and its implications for internet rights.
This analysis examines the constitutional implications of birthright citizenship, referencing Supreme Court interpretations and legal arguments.
Lyle Denniston, a pivotal figure in legal journalism, celebrates his 95th birthday today. His tenure at SCOTUSblog from 2004 to 2016 set a standard for legal reporting.
The Foilies 2026 report, authored by EFF and MuckRock contributors, identifies significant shortcomings in government transparency over the past year.
The court is expected to announce opinions on argued cases during a live blogging session on March 20, which may impact ongoing legal discussions.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is taking legal action against the Consumer Product Safety Council to enhance public access to critical legal information.
This analysis explores the implications of the court's approach to legislative history in judicial decision-making, focusing on its potential future relevance.
The Supreme Court case Trump v. Barbara raises critical questions about originalism and its application to birthright citizenship, reflecting on the implications for legal frameworks.
Rep. Leigh Finke's recent testimony against HF1434 raises critical questions about the implications of internet age-gating on infrastructure and access control.
Jerry Goldman, founder of the Oyez Project, discusses its significant impact on public understanding of the Supreme Court's decisions and processes.
The Trump administration is seeking Supreme Court intervention to pause a federal ruling that currently protects Haitian nationals from deportation, potentially affecting thousands.
The recent executive order issued by President Trump regarding birthright citizenship raises significant questions about its impact on citizenship rights and the interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
The application of the First Amendment to public university students is increasingly relevant, particularly amid recent campus protests regarding sensitive topics.
The intersection of copyright law and religious freedom raises concerns about the suppression of inquiry. The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society's actions highlight potential risks to open discourse.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) will host a launch event for Cindy Cohn's new book focused on data security and privacy rights on March 12, 2026.
The Supreme Court has added a case regarding the interaction of federal environmental laws to its 2026-27 docket, indicating a focus on regulatory frameworks.
The Justice Department is advocating for a contemporary understanding of birthright citizenship, which could reshape legal frameworks in immigration cases.
The US Court of Appeals has ruled that terms of service can be updated through email notifications, with user actions potentially indicating consent. This decision has significant implications for digital communication practices.
OpenAI's partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense raises significant concerns regarding the potential enhancement of AI surveillance capabilities.
Exploring the reasoning behind the emergency docket and its implications on constitutional decisions.
Justice Clarence Thomas' recent virtual participation in a legal conference raises ongoing concerns about court security and the unresolved Dobbs leak.
On this day in 1857, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Dred Scott v.
Cindy Cohn, Executive Director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is set to launch her memoir, 'Privacy’s Defender', published by MIT Press, as she prepares to leave the organization.